Articles

A classification-ordination analysis of a Belgian mixed forest in the transition zone of two phytogeographical districts. II. Spring data

Authors
  • P. Van Hecke
  • I. Impens
  • T. Van Tilborgh

Abstract

From  115 quadrats, laid out in the same way and on the same coordinates as  described in a first paper, cover-abundance and height data were collected in  april 1976 on 58 taxa, belonging to the upper and lower herb layer, on the  moss layer as a whole and on the litter. They were submitted to four  classification methods, namely Unweighted pair-group centroid technique  (UPGC), normal Association analysis (NAA) , agglomerative normal and inverse  Information analysis (NIA and IIA), Minimum variance clustering (MVC), and to  four ordination methods, namely Beals' Polar ordination (POS), Simple  ordination (SO), Optimized polar ordination (OPO) and Position vectors  ordination (PVO).     The only divisive method (NAA) produces more than sufficient results: they  are slightly better with the 1%-stopping rule especially when no species  reduction is involved. NAA and NIA give quite similar results. From the three  agglomerative techniques, the greatest number of vegetation- clusters (7),  recognizable in the field, has been obtained with MVC, the poorest picture  however by UPGC. With regard to the forest-structure, the better results are  with NIA, followed by MVC. Moreover. NIA applied in a quantitative way, is  less appropriate. The outcome of species classification is not  interpretable.    The ordination results obtained by OPO and PVO are better as compared to  those from POB and SO, as well in discovering gradients as clusters, the  gradients particularly reflect changes in cover-abundance and height. In the  ordination of vegetation quadrats, the total of the efficiency ratios  extracted for the first three axes in PVO and GPO are respectively four and  three times higher than with SO. Concerning the structure quadrats, the  percentage extraction values are very high and very alike.    Comparing the spring with the summer forest, UPGC distinguishes more  identifiable vegetation types in the summer data, NAA on the contrary in the  spring data.

How to Cite:

Van Hecke, P. & Impens, I. & Van Tilborgh, T., (1979) “A classification-ordination analysis of a Belgian mixed forest in the transition zone of two phytogeographical districts. II. Spring data”, Silva Gandavensis 45. doi: https://doi.org/10.21825/sg.v45i0.974

Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF

438 Views

191 Downloads

Published on
07 Nov 1979
Peer Reviewed
License